Forgotten Comics Wars

Or: How Angry Freelancers Made It Possible for A New Mainstream Comics Era (Including Vertigo) to Exist, Part 1

SRBDCRatingsdoc1b

  • I kicked this off earlier this week, on March 9th, with this initial post — consider it a modest prologue.
  • It is first essential to make you completely aware of the context of these events. This is both to frame all that is to follow — to make it absolutely obvious why some of us believed we had to act with some urgency, and why it was more than a little bit ridiculous that the major publishers, DC Comics Inc. prominent among them, were “taking measures” wholly inadequate and in fact quite counterproductive given the reality of the situation.

    This opening shot also hopefully provides an answer for those who’ve already contacted me directly, asking either “what did it matter?” and “who cares what a publisher, even one as big as DC, decides to do as far as self-regulating their own product?” These are both good questions, and while it was frustrating at the time how obtuse and/or obfuscating some of the creators and comics industry professionals seemed to be amid the raging controversy, it’s now essential to remind interested parties in 2010 what, precisely, was precipitating all this frantic activity.

    I can walk into my local Borders this morning and enjoy browsing, in an open environment, a plethora of graphic novels, manga, magazine racks and two spinner-racks of comic books sans labels. Bone, Tiny Teen Titans and a plethora of DC and Marvel superhero collections reprinting all-ages work from the 1930s-70s are racked right alongside The Walking Dead, Sandman, Hellblazer, Lost Girls, From Hell, etc. without qualm — or labels. The manga section (which is three times larger than the graphic novels section) is even more eclectic in this regard (that product does by and large sport labels, but is not racked according to labeling — the mature titles are not separated out — nor is the mature product segregated from the general manga racking).

    Praise be!

    Then as now, it’s a given that in bookstore environments, there is one section of children’s books wherein it is “safe” for kids to browse, a more risque (more taboo-teasing and busting in 2010 than would have been tolerated easily in 1986) teen and young adult readers section, and in the rest of the bookstore, you’re on your own.

    Labels aren’t required; whether it’s Henry Miller classics, sexually explicit memoirs, Danielle Steele or Stephen King bestsellers, or the most adventurous or grotty of adult prose, books are not emblazoned with ‘Adults Only!’ or ‘You Must Be Over 18 to Purchase This Book!’ stickers or banners.

    In 1986, however — and we didn’t know it then — the comic book Direct Sales Market was suffering its mid-life crisis. Underground comix, staking out territory completely apart from mainstream four-color comicbooks, had embraced variations on the ‘Adults Only’ on some titles since 1968. In every way, this was a badge of honor for comix, though there was precious little chance anyone would mistake a head shop or college-town bookshop rack of Zap, Slow Death, Snarf, Bizarre Sex or Big Ass Comics as anything but fare emphatically not for kiddies, and fucking proud of it.

    Once Phil Seuling invented the Direct Sales Market in the early 1970s, and comic book stores began to proliferate across North America in the 1980s, the confusion over what was and wasn’t permissable in the Direct Market retail environment became dangerously blurry.

    By the mid-1980s, the battle over increasingly adult and sales-worthy content in the wake of the mega-success of The Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen, among other successes both blockbuster and modest, was creating real problems for some retailers. While it was obvious to the indoctrinated that Frank Miller’s Batman was light years from the comfy all-ages Bob Kane/Bill Finger/Dick Sprang era of Batman, it wasn’t so obvious to the American public.

    SRBHeavyMetalOct1978cvr

    In the wake of Frank’s Daredevil, Alan and John and Rick and my Saga of the Swamp Thing, Howard Chaykin’s American Flagg, among other various ‘breaking out’ titles, it was becoming a problem.

    But it was the major blockbuster success, sales and press attention The Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen rightfully scored that really set off alarm bells. There had been skirmishes of sorts over now long-forgotten singular eruptions — the orgy page in a single chapter of Wendy and Richard Pini’s Elfquest, Warren’s notorious 1984/1994, Eclipse ComicsSaber ‘birth’ issue, various Love & Rockets and Fantagraphics issues, Frank Thorne’s increasingly adventurous fusions of female barbarian fantasy and sex, the Miracleman ‘birth’ issue (penciled by Rick Veitch), etc. — and yet to come were Fantagraphics’ Eros line, and much, much more.

    But throughout all this, with few ripples in few communities, Heavy Metal was sold month after month on American magazine newsstands everywhere. It had been since 1977, following in the footsteps of its parent magazine, the often raunchier National Lampoon.

    Now, look closely at the tiny moniker above the Heavy Metal title: it reads, “The Adult Illustrated Fantasy Magazine.”

    In short, the buzz over ‘adult’ comics and comix was a problem in a singular retail environment: the comicbook shop. 

    The popular perception of, and prejudice toward, comics as inherently a bastard offspring of children’s literature remained the problem.

    And some of us didn’t think labeling comics was a solution.

    Some of us still don’t — but the market, as I’ve already noted, has already sorted that out. It’s now a given that children’s comics are the exception, not the rule. Sin City, From Hell and Lost Girls in Borders and Barnes & Noble aren’t emblazoned with a stigmatic red “You Must Be Over 18!” warning label, any more than Joe Hill’s new novel Horns or the new anthology of zombie stories The New Dead have to be. 

    The reason some of us argued so vigorously against labeling as a viable solution is that we had already had ample evidence in 1986 that labels only served as bullseyes for lazy adults and authorities eager to bust comic shops.

    Case in point:

    SRBDCRatings2a
    SRBDCRatings2b

    Hmmmm, let’s take a closer look at this Illinois comics retailer bust, shall we? Read the officer’s narrative on the arrest report:

    SRBDCRatings2c

    Now, really read the key passage, in which the officer identifies (sans title) what “alerted” him to the fact that obscene material was in reach of a minor:

    SRBDCRatings2d

    That’s right.

    Our vigilant police officer busted the shop for a magazine many minors browsed in the nearby magazine newsstands — Heavy Metal.

    And he popped Friendly Frank’s for selling carefully chosen adult comic and comix product to the officer — an adult.

    And it was the label on Heavy Metal that alerted said vigilant officer that Friendly Frank’s Comics needed to be shut down, and immediately.

    Note, too: newsstands across the state of Illinois were not thereafter busted for racking and selling Heavy Metal.

    The venues were the targets, and the labels were the bullseyes.

    [Next: More on the Bust, and the Ratings Debacle Begins...]


    Discussion (11) ¬

    1. Brad Moore

      You know, all of this censoring was a curse to the black and white implosion of the 80’s and 90’s. My work was banned in England, Canada, and Wisconsin, for Bathory, Cadaver #3, Portrait of a Serial Killer(3rd printing), and Necrotica. I just did a strip, for Black Cat 13, issue #3, that had to be censored, and then cut down to 8 pages from 10.( due out, approx by Oct, 2010) It never ends!!

    2. Roger Green

      I may have mentioned this before, but when FantaCo (Albany,NY) got a HM with a topless woman, it would often go in the section with the adults-only undergrounds. If not, then no. This was in no small part to placate moms with their 14-y.o. sons coming in the shop The rest of the content did not usually matter.
      Off topic, but I always thought the back cover of the Amazing Herschell Gordon Lewis should been on front, and vice versa. The front showed seminude woman; the back cover was merely violent (and not all that). Sex has always been the greater bugaboo..

    3. srbissette

      True enough, Roger; what a crazy country we live in. Blood and guts, no prob; nudity, taboo!

      Brad, you weren’t alone! TABOO ended up being at one point or another banned (and even burned) in many English-speaking countries, including Canada, the UK, Australia — but not New Zealand. NZ customs reviewed the TABOO issue that had been seized and gave us a glowing review!

    4. Colin Tedford

      Ha, good for New Zealand!

      I think it says a lot about our culture that depictions of violence are so much more acceptable than those of sex or even nudity (as I’m sure plenty of others have said).

    5. MrJM

      minor typo: ‘This is both to frame all that is to follow — to make it absolutely obvious why some of [???] believed we had to act with some urgency, and why it was more than a little bit ridiculous that the major publishers, DC Comics Inc. prominent among them, were “taking measures” wholly inadequate and in fact quite counterproductive given the reality of the situation.’

      Typo aside, this is Great Stuff!

      Best wishes, etc.
      – MrJM

    6. srbissette

      Thanks! Typo corrected, and much appreciated — as is the compliment and your kind attention.

    7. JRB

      I have just discovered this series of essays, and I am finding it quite informative and interesting. I do, however, have a minor quibble with your introduction here.

      You say:
      “I can walk into my local Borders this morning and enjoy browsing, in an open environment, a plethora of graphic novels, manga, magazine racks and two spinner-racks of comic books sans labels. [...] The manga section (which is three times larger than the graphic novels section) is even more eclectic in this regard.”

      If you look at the covers of the manga in your local Borders, you will in fact see many, many labels; the vast majority of manga published in the US have age ratings. Viz, Tokyopop, Del Rey, and Yen use a broadly similar system that goes roughly: all-ages, youth (10+), teen (13+), older teen (16+), mature (18+); items in the “mature” category often have a “parental advisory – explicit content” warning as well. (Works that are specifically marketed as pornographic generally have “Adults Only” warnings, but big chains like Borders don’t usually carry that sort of manga.)

      These ratings have next to no legal weight, of course, but they are displayed on the cover for the benefit of parents (and the convenience of libraries, who are vocal in their appreciation for clear indicators of age categories, both for content and also for reading level). The degree to which the ratings are actually enforced by booksellers is questionable, but they are present and so far have sparked no jeremiads. M-rated manga rarely makes it onto bestseller lists, but I attribute that more to the huge popularity of manga for younger readers rather than to any distaste of sellers or buyers for the rating.

    8. srbissette

      Point taken, JRB, and thanks for that. Note that I didn’t say the manga had or did not have labels, but I’ve now gone back in and clarified that sentence.

      However, that doesn’t alter my key point: the graphic novels and manga are not shelved according to those labels (most are all alphabetical by title), nor are the labels resulting in separate shelving for ‘mature’ product. It’s all in the mix, and the browser/reader/buyer is on their own, as in the rest of the bookstore.

      Some Border’s, I’ve noticed, do have a printed placard in the graphic novels and manga sections screwed into the end of the shelving noting that not all the content is suitable for all ages; our local Border’s does not, but the one we did our THE NEW DEAD signing at in the Boston area did.

    Pings & Trackbacks ¬

    Comment ¬

    NOTE - You can use these tags:
    <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>