I’m going for a walk…

Man, I was up at 5:30 AM, read the paper, had a good breakfast, and planned my writing morning — including this morning’s blog posting — when my computer warm-up visit of a few boards landed me

  • here.
  • So, instead, the morning writing warm-up exercises that comprise this blog went there instead, hoping to curb such gross distortions of history I was involved in.

    Some days, you just get derailed a bit. This is one of ‘em. You do the best you can for people, with people, and still find a nice serving of shit waiting when you least expect it.

    The sun is out, the sky is blue, and it’s Indian Summer in Vermont.

    Fuck Taboo, fuck From Hell, fuck comics; I’m going for a walk.

    See you all later, here.


    I’m going for a walk…

    Man, I was up at 5:30 AM, read the paper, had a good breakfast, and planned my writing morning — including this morning’s blog posting — when my computer warm-up visit of a few boards landed me

  • here.
  • So, instead, the morning writing warm-up exercises that comprise this blog went there instead, hoping to curb such gross distortions of history I was involved in.

    Some days, you just get derailed a bit. This is one of ‘em. You do the best you can for people, with people, and still find a nice serving of shit waiting when you least expect it.

    The sun is out, the sky is blue, and it’s Indian Summer in Vermont.

    Fuck Taboo, fuck From Hell, fuck comics; I’m going for a walk.

    See you all later, here.


    Very Odds and One Sad End

    First off, a belated farewell to a fine artist. The last week in October, my amigo Tim Truman noted the passing of his good friend Keith Parkinson, D&D artist extraordinaire. I met Keith a couple of times in the 1980s during my comic conventions daze, and his work was key to the gaming and D&D realm for at least two decades. Alex Ness posted a succinct eulogy to Kevin at PopThought.com,

  • here.
  • But for an abundant tour of Keith‘s work, check out his own gallery at

  • Keith Parkinson’s website.
  • Keith succumbed to leukemia at the age of 47, a sobering reality for those of us his age. Keith, like Tim, was among the many artists whose work elevated TSR’s D&D line in the 1980s, and Keith expanded his horizons throughout the 1990s to lend his distinctive vision and leave a major mark on the entirity of fantasy and imaginative art. Here’s to Keith, his family, and his friends.
    __

    It’s been some time since I posted much about my ongoing work at and relations with the Center for Cartoon Studies, which is going great guns (that is, the CCS as well as my work). Last night Marj and I attended the CCS celebration of New Yorker cartoonist Ed Koren, which was well attended (more asses than seats, as they say, with no slight intended) and a successful fund-raiser for the school. Ed was a charmer, as were his cartoons. A trio of Ed‘s single-panel cartoons that were offered up, sans captions, for an on-the-spot captioning contest yielded some laughs from the captions suggested by those in attendance (including yours truly, who won a prize for one of my multiple entries for one Koren cartoon). Big fun, all and all, and a lively testimonial to the ongoing and growing health and vitality of the CCS. Kudos to co-founders James Sturm and Michelle Ollie, whose labors reward us all.

    BTW, Alan David Doane‘s engaging Kochalkaholic site offers a fresh take on the Center for Cartoon Studies via an interview with CCS student and cartoonist Josie Whitmore, which awaits you where

  • Josie tells all!
  • For my own humble part in all this, I can say that my ongoing comics history class “Survey of the Drawn Story” is making headway; we’ve just wrapped up the 1950s Kefauver hearings and comics code coverage (a staple of my old Journeys Into Fear slideshow/lecture) and an extensive overview of Harvey Kurtzman‘s seminal body of work, particular attention being given to his pre-Mad evolution to prep this week’s reading of the Mad archives in the library (you have nooooo idea what a kick it is to assign the reading of Mad after years of having copies of the zine ripped from my hands in school!). As we move into the Silver Age, European comics (which we have been tracing all along, including Herge‘s 1929 creation of TinTin and tracing of that series to WW2), formative precursors of the graphic novel form (again, an evolution we’ve been tracing since our first session in September), and the early rumblings of the underground, I’ll be able to bring in guest speakers as time and scheduling permit.
    __

    Relevent to the above, tonight I’ll be introducing and moderating an opening-night animation panel at the White River Independent Film Fest at the CCS. Details on this evening, and the entire weekend of cinema feasting, are available

  • here.
  • Hope to see some of you there!

    The evening kicks off with a screening of The Man Who Planted Trees (1987), an exquisite and moving half-hour Academy Award winning short helmed by Quebec-based animator extraordinaire Frederic Back. It’s a lovely work, as are Back‘s previous animated jewels All Nothing(1981) and the celebratory Crac! (1982) (which is among my favorite animated shorts of all time).

    This is a tough act to follow, but two Vermont animators rise to the occasion with their most recent efforts. Robert John Wurzburg and Meredith Holch are the creative souls whose work will be screened afterword, and discussed thereafter in a lively Q&A session. Wurzburg‘s Dogsharks offers a preview of a planned series adapting stories from the popular Dogsharks book series for young readers, while Holch‘s No Place Like Home uses animated figures and landscapes rendered on translucent tissue paper to illustrate (as the program states) “voices of refugees from Somalia, Sudan, Ivory Coast, Bosnia, and Tibet as they describe the realities of resettling in Vermont. Their experiences are then contrasted with eye-opening facts about the U.S. policy toward asylum seekers who arrive on their own rather than through official refugee resettlement programs.” I’m screening the latter this morning after signing off on this post — soooo, hope to see some of you tonight, and off to work I go!
    __

    That said, I must add one thing:

    My three-part October blog on Religion and Paleontological comics has spawned a lively thread some of you might find interesting over on The Comics Journal discussion board (link below). Among the participants are Clan Apis creator Jay Hosler, who is most visible countering articulate (which doesn’t per se mean I find them persuasive) pro-Intelligent Design posts from Jesse-Hamm, who is presenting the arguments of prominent ID authors like Phillip Johnson and molecular biologist and biochemist Michael Behe (writer of Darwin’s Black Box, which I read portions of after Peter Laird asked me what I thought about ID, and did not find particularly engaging, in part for reasons Jay verbalizes). Both Jesse and Jay have elevated this thread considerably with their back-and-forth exchanges; like Jay, I’d also recommend anyone interested track down and read Robert Pennock‘s book Tower of Babel. Pennock was recently a guest on Fresh Air, which made for a lively 40 minutes of listening. His book offers the most expansive, yet concise, overview of the Creationist and ID background, histories, and issues.

    For what it’s worth, among the threads many posts, Allen Rubinstein‘s sums up my own concerns when he writes, “The whole impetus for the political fight against evolution in classrooms… is that some people are offended that kids are being told something different in schools than they hear in church. There wouldn’t be an “Intelligent Design” movement without a group of people being attached to the scientific theory that one guy named Adam was formed out of clay and a lady named Eve was created out of a rib in Adam’s side (Test that one, egghead!). They wouldn’t give a crap what science had to say otherwise. If evolution has its flaws (or more accurately, aspects it hasn’t worked out yet), it’s still the best working set of ideas we’ve got at this point. Its existence is hardly a reason to simply “disprove” it out of hand unless there’s an agenda behind the effort. I see a lot of fear in this.” Agreed.

    My own comment (posted this morn) summarizes my current response to the exchange I’ve had with Jim Pinkoski on the likely-unread-by-most comments exchange on this very blog, following my comments on one of Jim‘s many comics, all of which is archived

  • here.
  • Responding to Jesse’s TCJ thread post, “…ID doesn’t invoke a creator God. ID infers a designer, who may or may not have belonged to the natural order. Many ID theorists believe in God, as do many evolutionary theorists, but theism is not a point either group relies on science to establish…”, I reply:

    No, but I doubt ID intends to evoke an image of a designer closer to Cthulhu than the anthropomorphised patriarchal humanoid Judeo-Christian archetype.

    Still, as an lifelong amateur nature-lover, it’s tough to equate the latter with the myriad parasitic lifeforms that we unknowingly interact with daily. Once one is acquainted with the fascinating life cycles of, say, fungal forms that infect invertebrates and complete their life cycle by mysteriously driving their host to assume the mating position in death atop the highest possible vegetation (a reed, a stalk, etc.) to ensure the fungus perpetuating its own as soon as an unwary fellow invertebrate obeys its instinct to couple and copulate, that cozy image of a divine, all-loving patriarch with a big white beard who sits in heaven and loves us all becomes a might — uh, less benign.

    If you insist upon not only ID’s focal goal — acknowledgement of a designer — to follow that with the insistence that we all agree upon the nature (or, as some do, even the gender) of that designer most certainly enters the realm of theology, not science.

    Evolutionary theory seeks to explore and articulate a mechanism of observable change in nature and lifeforms, ancient (e.g., the fossil record) and contemporary — not its source.

    Furthermore, the undermining of geology in some Creationist and ID texts (a reading of which I never represented as definitive) further corrodes either having any coherent value as a science. If you drive a car or use plastics in your home, you’re utterly dependent on a science that is inherently incompatible with a literalist interpretation of Genesis or its absurd intepretation of geological time.

    I’m all for those who derive comfort and guidance from faith in their lives. But your form of faith may not, and most likely never will, be my own.

    ID most certainly “invokes” a specific form and faith associated with its belief in a designer. ID implicitly and explicitly adheres to the belief that said designer “made us” in “His” image, thus affixing an article of faith to its mysterious core: the designer.

    To imply or state otherwise is at best sleight of hand that won’t stand up to even the most rudimentary associative scrutiny, and at worst deceptive and deceitful, which is contrary to one of the commandments, is it not?

    If you’re so inclined, catch up on the conversation over

  • here.

  • Very Odds and One Sad End

    First off, a belated farewell to a fine artist. The last week in October, my amigo Tim Truman noted the passing of his good friend Keith Parkinson, D&D artist extraordinaire. I met Keith a couple of times in the 1980s during my comic conventions daze, and his work was key to the gaming and D&D realm for at least two decades. Alex Ness posted a succinct eulogy to Kevin at PopThought.com,

  • here.
  • But for an abundant tour of Keith‘s work, check out his own gallery at

  • Keith Parkinson’s website.
  • Keith succumbed to leukemia at the age of 47, a sobering reality for those of us his age. Keith, like Tim, was among the many artists whose work elevated TSR’s D&D line in the 1980s, and Keith expanded his horizons throughout the 1990s to lend his distinctive vision and leave a major mark on the entirity of fantasy and imaginative art. Here’s to Keith, his family, and his friends.
    __

    It’s been some time since I posted much about my ongoing work at and relations with the Center for Cartoon Studies, which is going great guns (that is, the CCS as well as my work). Last night Marj and I attended the CCS celebration of New Yorker cartoonist Ed Koren, which was well attended (more asses than seats, as they say, with no slight intended) and a successful fund-raiser for the school. Ed was a charmer, as were his cartoons. A trio of Ed‘s single-panel cartoons that were offered up, sans captions, for an on-the-spot captioning contest yielded some laughs from the captions suggested by those in attendance (including yours truly, who won a prize for one of my multiple entries for one Koren cartoon). Big fun, all and all, and a lively testimonial to the ongoing and growing health and vitality of the CCS. Kudos to co-founders James Sturm and Michelle Ollie, whose labors reward us all.

    BTW, Alan David Doane‘s engaging Kochalkaholic site offers a fresh take on the Center for Cartoon Studies via an interview with CCS student and cartoonist Josie Whitmore, which awaits you where

  • Josie tells all!
  • For my own humble part in all this, I can say that my ongoing comics history class “Survey of the Drawn Story” is making headway; we’ve just wrapped up the 1950s Kefauver hearings and comics code coverage (a staple of my old Journeys Into Fear slideshow/lecture) and an extensive overview of Harvey Kurtzman‘s seminal body of work, particular attention being given to his pre-Mad evolution to prep this week’s reading of the Mad archives in the library (you have nooooo idea what a kick it is to assign the reading of Mad after years of having copies of the zine ripped from my hands in school!). As we move into the Silver Age, European comics (which we have been tracing all along, including Herge‘s 1929 creation of TinTin and tracing of that series to WW2), formative precursors of the graphic novel form (again, an evolution we’ve been tracing since our first session in September), and the early rumblings of the underground, I’ll be able to bring in guest speakers as time and scheduling permit.
    __

    Relevent to the above, tonight I’ll be introducing and moderating an opening-night animation panel at the White River Independent Film Fest at the CCS. Details on this evening, and the entire weekend of cinema feasting, are available

  • here.
  • Hope to see some of you there!

    The evening kicks off with a screening of The Man Who Planted Trees (1987), an exquisite and moving half-hour Academy Award winning short helmed by Quebec-based animator extraordinaire Frederic Back. It’s a lovely work, as are Back‘s previous animated jewels All Nothing(1981) and the celebratory Crac! (1982) (which is among my favorite animated shorts of all time).

    This is a tough act to follow, but two Vermont animators rise to the occasion with their most recent efforts. Robert John Wurzburg and Meredith Holch are the creative souls whose work will be screened afterword, and discussed thereafter in a lively Q&A session. Wurzburg‘s Dogsharks offers a preview of a planned series adapting stories from the popular Dogsharks book series for young readers, while Holch‘s No Place Like Home uses animated figures and landscapes rendered on translucent tissue paper to illustrate (as the program states) “voices of refugees from Somalia, Sudan, Ivory Coast, Bosnia, and Tibet as they describe the realities of resettling in Vermont. Their experiences are then contrasted with eye-opening facts about the U.S. policy toward asylum seekers who arrive on their own rather than through official refugee resettlement programs.” I’m screening the latter this morning after signing off on this post — soooo, hope to see some of you tonight, and off to work I go!
    __

    That said, I must add one thing:

    My three-part October blog on Religion and Paleontological comics has spawned a lively thread some of you might find interesting over on The Comics Journal discussion board (link below). Among the participants are Clan Apis creator Jay Hosler, who is most visible countering articulate (which doesn’t per se mean I find them persuasive) pro-Intelligent Design posts from Jesse-Hamm, who is presenting the arguments of prominent ID authors like Phillip Johnson and molecular biologist and biochemist Michael Behe (writer of Darwin’s Black Box, which I read portions of after Peter Laird asked me what I thought about ID, and did not find particularly engaging, in part for reasons Jay verbalizes). Both Jesse and Jay have elevated this thread considerably with their back-and-forth exchanges; like Jay, I’d also recommend anyone interested track down and read Robert Pennock‘s book Tower of Babel. Pennock was recently a guest on Fresh Air, which made for a lively 40 minutes of listening. His book offers the most expansive, yet concise, overview of the Creationist and ID background, histories, and issues.

    For what it’s worth, among the threads many posts, Allen Rubinstein‘s sums up my own concerns when he writes, “The whole impetus for the political fight against evolution in classrooms… is that some people are offended that kids are being told something different in schools than they hear in church. There wouldn’t be an “Intelligent Design” movement without a group of people being attached to the scientific theory that one guy named Adam was formed out of clay and a lady named Eve was created out of a rib in Adam’s side (Test that one, egghead!). They wouldn’t give a crap what science had to say otherwise. If evolution has its flaws (or more accurately, aspects it hasn’t worked out yet), it’s still the best working set of ideas we’ve got at this point. Its existence is hardly a reason to simply “disprove” it out of hand unless there’s an agenda behind the effort. I see a lot of fear in this.” Agreed.

    My own comment (posted this morn) summarizes my current response to the exchange I’ve had with Jim Pinkoski on the likely-unread-by-most comments exchange on this very blog, following my comments on one of Jim‘s many comics, all of which is archived

  • here.
  • Responding to Jesse’s TCJ thread post, “…ID doesn’t invoke a creator God. ID infers a designer, who may or may not have belonged to the natural order. Many ID theorists believe in God, as do many evolutionary theorists, but theism is not a point either group relies on science to establish…”, I reply:

    No, but I doubt ID intends to evoke an image of a designer closer to Cthulhu than the anthropomorphised patriarchal humanoid Judeo-Christian archetype.

    Still, as an lifelong amateur nature-lover, it’s tough to equate the latter with the myriad parasitic lifeforms that we unknowingly interact with daily. Once one is acquainted with the fascinating life cycles of, say, fungal forms that infect invertebrates and complete their life cycle by mysteriously driving their host to assume the mating position in death atop the highest possible vegetation (a reed, a stalk, etc.) to ensure the fungus perpetuating its own as soon as an unwary fellow invertebrate obeys its instinct to couple and copulate, that cozy image of a divine, all-loving patriarch with a big white beard who sits in heaven and loves us all becomes a might — uh, less benign.

    If you insist upon not only ID’s focal goal — acknowledgement of a designer — to follow that with the insistence that we all agree upon the nature (or, as some do, even the gender) of that designer most certainly enters the realm of theology, not science.

    Evolutionary theory seeks to explore and articulate a mechanism of observable change in nature and lifeforms, ancient (e.g., the fossil record) and contemporary — not its source.

    Furthermore, the undermining of geology in some Creationist and ID texts (a reading of which I never represented as definitive) further corrodes either having any coherent value as a science. If you drive a car or use plastics in your home, you’re utterly dependent on a science that is inherently incompatible with a literalist interpretation of Genesis or its absurd intepretation of geological time.

    I’m all for those who derive comfort and guidance from faith in their lives. But your form of faith may not, and most likely never will, be my own.

    ID most certainly “invokes” a specific form and faith associated with its belief in a designer. ID implicitly and explicitly adheres to the belief that said designer “made us” in “His” image, thus affixing an article of faith to its mysterious core: the designer.

    To imply or state otherwise is at best sleight of hand that won’t stand up to even the most rudimentary associative scrutiny, and at worst deceptive and deceitful, which is contrary to one of the commandments, is it not?

    If you’re so inclined, catch up on the conversation over

  • here.

  • Transparent Corruption: How Deep Can This Guano Get?

    Let’s see: From multiple news sources, we now have Karl Rove hoping he’s dodged the bullet I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby took last Friday, and that Rove “may offer a formal apology” (apology not accepted, if it’s offered — how do we usurp this unelected all-too-powerful figure?); Wilkerson continuing to detail the extreme power wielded by Vice (indeed) President Dick Cheney and the methodology of that “cabal” with Rumsfeld to shape government policy (and intelligence) to their whim, foreign and domestic; all while Cheney aggressively refuses sanction of, and fights, a bill (prepared in part by former Vietnam POW and torture survivor Senator John McCain, who Rove and Bush handily slandered in the initial Bush Presidential campaign) which will force his torture state to cease ongoing torture and abuse of prisoners and detainees (what possible spin can be placed on this by any but the most rabid pro-torture advocates, however much they claim otherwise?); and Tom DeLay‘s attornies have managed the dismissal of the Texan judge previously assigned to his case due to political affiliations displeasing to DeLay (hmmm, does that mean he gets to choose a judge to his liking — meaning a ReBiblican? This just gets richer every step of the way). They are, of course, also campaigning for a change of venue, while publicly attacking the prosecutor (with foaming attack dog TV commercials). All while Bush’s recent choice of right-wing Third Circuit Court of Appeals judge Samuel Alito to replace critical swing-voter Judge Sandra Day O’Connor on the Supreme Court stirs the pot, and not coincidentally tipping the Supreme Court further still to the right if Alito is indeed seated. Meanwhile (can you stand it?), corporations continue to cancel (thus fleece) retirement and health-care policies for their workers with the sanction of our government (even as the corporate CEOs behind this latest abuse pocket spiralling, mind-bending bonuses and pay). Relevent to which, in a clear vote along partisan lines, the first proposed minimum raise hike in almost a decade (the last was in ’97) is defeated by a corrupt Senate who have hiked their own pay almost annually since ’97. Quote:

    “U.S. senators — who draw salaries of $162,100 a year and enjoy a raft of perks — have rejected a minimum wage hike from $5.15 an hour to $6.25 for blue-collar workers. The proposed increase was sponsored by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and turned down in the Senate by a vote of 51 against the boost and 49 in favor. . . All the Democrats voted for the wage boost. All the negative votes were cast by Republicans. Four Republicans voted for it…” (quoted from Helen Thomas’s article, Hearst News)

    You got that? Four Republicans voted for it. 51 against, after having voted in their own pay raises a short while ago. Don’t take my word for it — go to:

  • Minimum Pay Raise Crushed
  • Having worked at minimum wage myself (most recently just after that ’97 wage “hike”), and with many friends (and two young adult offspring) who eke out paltry livings working at or just above minimum wage, sans any benefits, I can tell you it’s impossible to make ends meet in any way working for minimum wage (though many of you know that from hard experience).

    This isn’t a joke. If the goal is spreading poverty, they’re succeeding admirably.

    In conjunction with that decision, hunger in the US has now officially increased 43% since Bush assumed the throne. “The House Agriculture Committee approved budget cuts Friday that would take food stamps away from an estimated 300,000 people and could cut off school lunches and breakfasts for 40,000 children. The action came as the government reported that the number of people who are hungry because they can’t afford to buy enough food rose to 38.2 million in 2004, an increase of 7 million in five years. The number represents nearly 12 percent of U.S. households.” That from Libby Quaid at the Associated Press — go to:

  • GOP Slashes Food Stamps, Lunch Programs
  • That as we move into winter with the highest heating oil (and thus all heat source) prices in our lifetimes. Stave off the cold or starve? That’s the choice many face starting as soon as the cold hits.

    That’s just the tip of the garbage in sight this morning.

    As I’ve said, it’s almost impossible to rationally take all this in and articulate it on even the most superficial level without sounding like a raving lunatic. But it’s all happening, right now. It’s all our collective national reality.

    The latest — which HomeyM emailed me last week, but which I sat on until finding multiple corroborating sources, including an on-air interview with a UK editor of Fortune magazine on last night’s CBC news program As It Happens — is this gem. Following the ongoing and transparent links between the Bush family (including ex-President Poppa Bush) and various Republican officials and The Carlysle Group and other war-profiteering firms, and the widely-known-and-acknowledged history between Cheney and Halliburton et al, we now have a direct correlation between Donald Rumsfeld and the pharmaceutical firm with controlling proprietary interests in Tamiflu.

    This shines another disturbing light on Monday’s sleight-of-hand, “don’t-look-there-look-HERE” fear-mongering speech from President Bush, outlined in this excerpt from an October news item (predating Monday’s relevent President Bush speech) by Dr. Mercola. Read on, read closely:

    “Rumsfeld To Profit From Bird Flu Hoax

    …Not long ago, President Bush sought to instill panic in this country by telling us a minimum of 200,000 people will die from the avian flu pandemic, but it could be as bad as 2 million deaths in this country alone. This hoax is then used to justify the immediate purchase of 80 million doses of Tamiflu, a worthless drug that in no way shape or form treats the avian flu, but only decreases the amount of days one is sick and can actually contribute to the virus having more lethal mutations. …the U.S. placed an order for 20 million doses of this worthless drug at a price of $100 per dose. That comes to a staggering $2 billion.
    …Roche manufactures Tamiflu and, in a recent 
    New York Times article, they were battling whether or not they would allow generic drug companies to help increase their production.
    …that a drug was actually developed by a company called Gilead that 10 years ago gave Roche the exclusive rights to market and sell Tamiflu.

    …Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was made the chairman of Gilead in 1997. Since Rumsfeld holds major portions of stock in Gilead, he will handsomely profit from the scare tactics of the government that is being used to justify the purchase of $2 billion of Tamiflu.”

    As I say, I held off posting this until it could be verified by multiple sources. The foreign press has done so, and last night’s As It Happens jaw-dropping interview with the UK Fortune editor was the final confirmation I sought. Dr. Mercola continues:

    “If you have been viewing the media you must have seen the scare the media and the president are seeking to orchestrate on you and the public. According to a draft of the government’s plan to fight a potentially cataclysmic pandemic, this new bird super-flu could kill nearly 2 MILLION Americans. But I nearly fell out of my seat in the airplane as I was flying back from a conference in Ft. Lauderdale when I read that in the BEST-case scenario, only 200,000 people might die. Then they post the frightening picture from the 1918 flu epidemic to heighten the fear. It just amazes me how they can get away with this type of reporting that is so obviously manipulated by the government and drug companies to scare you into taking the flu vaccine. The popular media continues to reinforce this unbased fear. In the editorial section of the October 17, 2005 issue of the Wall Street Journal, Dr. Henry Miller, former director of the Office of Biotechnology at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), seeks to frighten the U.S. public by telling us that the bird flu virus can jump from birds to humans and produce, and is a fatal illness in 50 percent of those infected.

    A 50 percent fatality rate sounds pretty scary to me. What Dr. Miller and the other experts fail to explain is how these numbers were derived. Did they examine everyone who contracted the bird flu and use those numbers, or did they examine the sickest of the sick who had come down with the bird flu and determine the mortality rate from there? Of course, it was the latter, and from the 60 people who have died from this in THIRD-world countries we are being told that anywhere from 200,000, AT BEST, to 2 million people at worst will die from the bird flu. This is shoddy science at best and beyond belief that any reputable scientist could get away with such nonsense.

    …The bird flu epidemic hoax reminds me just how uncommon “common sense” is. Folks, where is the sound basic science here? How do they make the giant leap of faith that 60 deaths will translate to 2 million or even 200,00 deaths in the United States from a virus that does NOT readily spread from birds to humans, or humans to humans?
    Most of the people who acquired this infection were bird handlers who were in continuous contact with these sick birds. Does anyone in their right mind envision similar circumstances in the United States?

    …What might the purpose of these scare tactics be you ask?
    Well how about the United States purchasing huge quantities of antiviral drugs and an increase in flu vaccine production, along with purchasing 20 million doses of the highly questionably effective Tamiflu. Guess how much one treatment of Tamiflu costs?  Give yourself a slap on the back if you guessed $100. So those 20 million doses the government has authorized will cost U.S. taxpayers $2 BILLION.”

    Which, natch, profits Donald Rumsfeld and his cronies handsomely.

    Continuing:
    “…Now I think very few of us would mind if this drug actually worked and prevented even a few people from dying. But does it do that? Not really. About all anyone can expect from this drug is that it might make the symptoms a bit less severe.”

    BTW, this has now been confirmed by multiple sources; see the link, provided below, if you seek more information.

    Continuing:
    “On the downside, (aside from setting you back $100) Dr. Tenpenny explained in her Flu TeleClinic last week that Tamiflu can actually cause the virus to mutate into a more dangerous and potent viral strain. Recently, U.S. Congress asked Roche, the maker of Tamiflu, to suspend its patent and have others make it because they could not likely keep up with the demand, but of course Roche refused saying Tamiflu is hard to make and it would take another company three years to “get up to speed.” What they were really saying is they could care less about the public. What their primary focus was on was to not share their windfall profits mandated by the U.S. Congress.”

    The good doctor goes on to note, “…let us not forget the flu shots that many will get when they confuse bird flu with the regular flu. Please understand, even if you believe the flu shots work, the flu shot you can now purchase is in no way, shape or form designed to protect you against the bird flu. They are completely different strains. (Bird flu is H5N1 strain). But rest assured the makers of flu vaccines will not lose this unusal opportunity to rape the American public for even more profits. Recently we learned that those getting the flu shots may see a 25 percent increase in prices at clinics, doctors’ offices and medical centers because of increases in the wholesale cost of the vaccines.

    …Meanwhile, the “Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005″ (S. 1873), recently passed out of the U.S. Senate HELP Committee one day after it was introduced. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is calling the bill “a drug company stockholder’s dream and a consumer’s worst nightmare.” This bill, spurred by bird flu fears, will broadly eliminate corporate liability for vaccines and drugs. This bill will soon go to the full Senate for a vote…. The proposed legislation, nicknamed “Bioshield Two,” is being pushed rapidly through Congress without time for voters to make their voices heard by their elected representatives. It will strip Americans of the right to a trial by jury if they are harmed by a drug or vaccine that they are forced by government to take, whenever federal health officials declare a public health emergency. The bill establishes the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA), as the single point of authority within the government for research and development of drugs and vaccines in response to bioterrorism and natural disease outbreaks. BARDA will operate in secret, exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, insuring that no evidence of injuries or deaths caused by drugs and vaccines labeled as “countermeasures” will become public. This proposed legislation is an unconstitutional attempt by some in Congress to give a taxpayer-funded handout to pharmaceutical companies for drugs and vaccines the government can force all citizens to use, while absolving everyone connected from any responsibility for injuries and deaths which occur.”

    We’ve all seen how this current Administration has stood up against (cough, cough) the power pharmaceutical lobbies.

    So, as the grip “The War on Terror” held over our collective populace for the past five years wanes daily, we now have this new batch of blatant fear-mongering, all calculated to profit Bush‘s key cronies once again while further empowering corporations orchestrated and fanning the flames.

    Lest you think sanctioning blanket indemnity for vaccine and pharmaceutical firms is a great idea, remember the 5 million swine-flu vaccine program of three decades ago. “The hastily contrived program for swine flu resulted in hundreds of Guillain Barre Syndrome paralysis victims as well as countless deaths for a flu pandemic that never materialized.” At the time, investigative journalist Ida Honorof (then recipient of a first prize award from Associated Press for investigative journalism) called that swine-flu pandemic fear-mongering and the resulting vaccination program “The most brazen, obscene electioneering ploy” profered by that standing President “and his coterie of scientific hacks, fabricated to cause pure unadulterated panic and guarantee political capital, rammed through without consideration of people’s health and lives and approved by a band-wagon Congress…”

    So give this some thought and do some homework before you embrace the panic.

    The Martians have not landed in New Jersey, nor has the avian flu erupted.

    The reality is, and remains, that 60 people have died out of less than 200 infected to date, worldwide, period. Is there cause for concern? Yes, but as all responsible medical authorities have stated and restated since Monday’s speech, no flu vaccination effective against such a possible pandemic yet exists, nor can it exist until that strain of flu manifests itself.

    This is more fear-mongering from a President and Administration desperate to divert the attention of the American people from the consequences of their own blatant abuses of power and increasingly evident corruption.

    It is transparent and the same mechanism, in a new guise, that they have relied upon from the beginning of their initial Presidential campaign.

    It is also, sadly typical of this Administration, orchestrated to profit their own.

    They are frightening you as they fleece you, and all of us.

    For more information on the medical view of this situation, go to:

  • Rumsfeld Makes Out